The codes used to list the grades are those provided to me in your e-mail message for Part 1 of Assignment #1. If you neglected to specify one at that point, or if you wish to change the code I am using, simply send an e-mail to amgilder@cs.unh.edu indicating a new code.
No grades currently available
Although you will undoubtedly hear me describe it several times in class, the method which I use to accomplish the assignment of letter grades seems to cause students a great deal of confusion. Therefore, in the interest of full disclosure, I will lay out the entire process here and hope that this helps to eliminate some of the surprises.
First, however, I need to dispel some common misconceptions:
So, in short, when I assign final letter grades, I do so by considering the grades you have earned throughout the semester; no more, no less.
The first step is to calculate a numeric average for each student in the section. This average is calculated by applying the weightings described on the General Info page to the recorded grades for the semester.
Next, I sort the section roster into descending order based upon the students semester averages and calculate the average of these averages to give me the section average.
Using the section average, I decide where to place the dividing line between those students who will receive a B- and those who will receive a C+. In general, I will use the class average as this dividing line. However, if I feel the section as a whole performed exceptionally well, I may establish this dividing line at a score less than the section average.
Once the dividing line is established between B- and C+, I look at the students whose averages place them at the top of the ranking and decide what grade I feel they have earned. Generally, this will be an A, but it may be an A- or even a B+ if I feel circumstances warrant.
Then, I look at the students whose averages place them at the bottom of the ranking and decide what grade I feel they have earned. The hardest decision I must make for these students is whether or not to assign an F. According to the University grading guidelines an F is intended to indicate academic performance so deficient in quality as to be unacceptable for credit. Therefore, when deciding whether or not a particular grade should be an F, I must ask myself the question:
Do the objective measures I have of this students performance (that is, their numerical grades) demonstrate a level of mastery of the course material that I feel justifies their receiving credit for the course?
And if the answer to that question is no, then I am obliged to assign a grade of F. While it is never pleasant to assign a failing grade, as an educator I have a responsibility to a larger community that takes precedence over individual situations, and when I assign grades I must fulfill that responsibility.
If the answer to the question is yes, then I must decide what level of passing grade the student has earned. Generally, this will be something in the D range for those students who pass at the bottom of the ranking.
Having established these three milestones at the top, bottom, and middle of the ranking, I work through the list looking for logical places to establish the other dividing lines. Whenever possible, I try to establish these dividing lines in places where they will not separate students whose performance differs negligibly.
In general, I find that while this approach does not always result in every student getting the grade for which they had been hoping, it does result in an allocation of grades that is well-distributed and fair. And while it may not always seem that the grade you receive is fair to you as an individual, I am confident that the grades I assign using this method are fair to you in the bigger picture as a member of the section and the University community as a whole.